Written by Article by Justian Philips
A great boon for the theory of evolution was the Miller/Urey experiment. This experiment used a number of chemicals, including ammonia and hydrogen. Sending electrical charges through these chemicals produced two of the very simplest of amino acids (a couple of the building blocks for a protein molecule).This experimentation gave promise to the hope that maybe this was how life was formed. This scientific experiment gained much public attention because it began to give validity to the idea that life came from non-living (inorganic) chemicals.It wasn’t long before this hope was dashed. Some huge problems arose:
One of these was the fact that there was no oxygen used in the experiment. Almost all life forms require oxygen. But oxygen would have completely ‘ruined’ the experiment (it would cause an explosion). Oxygen, although needed for almost all forms of life, will eliminate the possibility of life also during the ‘formation of life’. I.e. the exact same ingredient that is required for life is the very thing that eliminates life in the beginning stages.
Besides this problem, others arise as well:1. There is no scientific evidence that the atmosphere was even close to the ‘atmosphere’ that was used in the experiment has never existed on earth.2. If it ever did exist, it would be deadly to virtually all forms of life on earth3. The chemicals used in the experiment would eliminate the life forming possibilities.The experiment has ended up being a dead end for people looking for the ‘beginning of life’ (according to the theory of evolution).
And it gets worse.
Even evolutionists in general admit that the Miller/Urey experiment does nothing to bolster the evolution theory. But this experiment is still used by teachers, professors and textbooks to support the evolution theory.So, although this experiment is not valid (to support Darwin’s Evolution Theory), our children are still being taught that it is a valid support for the theory. Textbooks throughout the US still use this experiment even though it has been discarded by most evoltuionists many decades ago as any support for the theory.That would mean that our young adults and even our children are being instructed with ‘facts’ that contradict science (Unfortunately, there are literally dozens of these examples are still being taught from textbooks across our nation).Students are being taught Darwin’s evolution theory by ‘facts’ that have been disproved years ago. Is it time to replace this kind of information in textbooks with the real scientific facts? Or should we allow these textbooks to continue giving our students outdated (and false) information?
Next: learn more scientific facts that are causing serious problems for Darwin’s evolution theory. Learn more stunning information that we were never taught in school